Sunday October 16, 2011
| [Time] Name | Message |
|---|---|
| [06:33] EhevuTov | anyone know why for Node.js there is a package named "zmq" and one named "zeromq"? |
| [10:19] mikko | good morning |
| [10:35] sustrik | morning |
| [10:35] mikko | sustrik: should i disable tests for libzmq at the moment? |
| [10:35] mikko | it still gets stuck |
| [10:39] mikko | cremes: there? |
| [10:49] mikko | Assertion failed: (elapsed > 440000 && elapsed < 550000), function main, file test_timeo.cpp, line 73. |
| [10:49] mikko | i assume this is vmware time issue |
| [11:21] sustrik | mikko: quite possible |
| [12:41] sustrik | mikko: there? |
| [17:57] cremes | mikko: try running the specs now and see if you still get hangs |
| [17:57] cremes | i think i have solved all of the issues |
| [21:18] test | hi |
| [21:19] test | can someone answer me a question about zeromq on windows? |
| [21:24] mantzas | hi is someone active here? |
| [21:35] mikko | cremes: some fails against 3.0 |
| [21:35] cremes | if they are for PUB binding, then it's a legitimate failure |
| [21:35] mikko | http://build.zero.mq/view/ffi-rzmq/job/ffi-rzmq-master_libzmq3-0_GCC-debian/4/console |
| [21:37] cremes | mikko: 13 & 14 are due to a bug in 3.0 |
| [21:37] cremes | mikko: the rest i have not see before... i test on osx & windows where those specs pass |
| [21:37] cremes | let me try it on linux; i'll try to figure out how to get those working on linux |
| [21:40] cremes | mikko: i don't get those FD failures on my linux box |
| [21:43] mikko | cremes: against 3.0? |
| [21:43] cremes | ah, against 2.1 |
| [21:43] cremes | let me try 3.0... hang on |
| [21:45] mikko | 2.1 succeeds |
| [21:45] mikko | 3.0 fails |
| [22:00] cremes | mikko: errno is set to 88 (ENOTSOCK) |
| [22:00] cremes | maybe it's a legitimate bug for 3.0? |
| [22:32] mikko | cremes: don't know |
| [22:32] mikko | cremes: sounds odd |
| [22:35] mikko | cremes: sounds like the socket is closed when the call happens |
| [22:57] sundbp | cremes: on my windows box in the office i get 2-3 specs failing on 2.1. looks timing related somehow, 2 fails pretty reliably but 1 once in a while. i think they're "false negatives" though. when i'm there tomorrow i can post you the details. |
| [22:59] sundbp | cremes: all pass reliably on my osx box at home |