| [Time] Name | Message |
|
[07:58] dsfsfadfsda
|
nick
|
|
[08:00] kaka11chen
|
whois alcy
|
|
[08:01] grzesieq
|
you keep missing the slash ;-)
|
|
[08:01] kaka11chen
|
thx
|
|
[08:01] kaka11chen
|
I am a new ircer
|
|
[08:23] kaka11chen
|
whois kaka11chen
|
|
[08:25] guido_g
|
hrhrhr
|
|
[08:51] guido_g
|
fyi http://code.google.com/p/django-dmq/wiki/Djangocon2011submission
|
|
[08:51] guido_g
|
just seen
|
|
[09:08] loxs
|
hi, I'm looking at the erlang examples, but they feel quite awkward :)
|
|
[09:09] loxs
|
could anyone show me some "proper" OTP way of doing zeromq stuff
|
|
[11:18] whyzgeek
|
hi guys I am new to zeromq, can somebody tell me quickly if it has support for persistancy?
|
|
[11:22] maciej
|
ZMQ_ROUTER - If the peer does not exist anymore the message shall be silently discarded - question being - I have ROUTER <-> ROUTER pair, can I send my message to any peer? (sort of discovery, I'm quering for first available worker)
|
|
[11:30] mikko
|
whyzgeek: in zeromq the persistence is delegated to application layer
|
|
[11:30] mikko
|
whyzgeek: if by persistence you mean writing to disk and syncing
|
|
[11:40] whyzgeek
|
ic thanks
|
|
[13:15] nicolas
|
hi
|
|
[13:15] nicolas
|
any ideas about this?: Assertion failed: msg_->flags & ZMQ_MSG_MORE (rep.cpp:81)
|
|
[13:15] mikko
|
yes
|
|
[13:15] mikko
|
i've seen this before
|
|
[13:15] mikko
|
whats the socket on the other end?
|
|
[13:16] nicolas
|
pub / sub
|
|
[13:16] mikko
|
rep socket connected to pub socket?
|
|
[13:16] nicolas
|
yes
|
|
[13:17] nicolas
|
no , sorry
|
|
[13:17] nicolas
|
that was reported on the publisher side
|
|
[13:17] mikko
|
does the publisher use rep sockets?
|
|
[13:17] pieterh
|
nicolas_: what version of 0MQ are you using?
|
|
[13:17] nicolas
|
wait let me check
|
|
[13:18] pieterh
|
presumably it's 2.1.6 or something like that
|
|
[13:18] mikko
|
there is still similar(ish) issue in req.cpp
|
|
[13:18] mikko
|
line 87
|
|
[13:18] nicolas
|
2.1.4
|
|
[13:19] pieterh
|
nicolas_: please use latest stable
|
|
[13:19] nicolas
|
yes sorry, we are having some trouble with updating the production server
|
|
[13:19] pieterh
|
mikko: the assert is still there but should never trigger
|
|
[13:19] nicolas
|
anyways, is there any explanation in the changelog ?
|
|
[13:20] pieterh
|
nicolas_: certainly, did you check?
|
|
[13:20] nicolas
|
the only thing I found was * Fixed issue 228, assertion failure at rep.cpp:88 when HWM was reached.
|
|
[13:20] mikko
|
pieterh_: you can trigger it by using XRE(P|Q) socket on other end
|
|
[13:20] pieterh
|
hmm indeed
|
|
[13:20] mikko
|
and sending malformed message
|
|
[13:21] pieterh
|
mikko: ok, then we need to log an issue and make a test case
|
|
[13:21] pieterh
|
then I can patch that in stable
|
|
[13:21] pieterh
|
nicolas_: sorry, you're right, seems to be an unsolved bug
|
|
[13:22] nicolas
|
i'm not using rep sockets
|
|
[13:22] nicolas
|
in the case of that bug at least
|
|
[13:23] nicolas
|
in our development server we are using 2.1.7 .. haven't seen that same bug I think, though the production server has considerably more network traffic and load
|
|
[13:23] pieterh
|
nicolas_: it should not be an issue of load
|
|
[13:24] pieterh
|
https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-211
|
|
[13:24] pieterh
|
it is solved, seems
|
|
[13:25] pieterh
|
Fixed in 2.1.7
|
|
[13:25] pieterh
|
You can search the issue tracker for assertions like this
|
|
[13:25] nicolas
|
the strange thing is that im not using REP
|
|
[13:25] nicolas
|
its ZMQ_PUB
|
|
[13:26] pieterh
|
well, something in your app is using rep...
|
|
[13:26] nicolas
|
yes your'e right :)
|
|
[13:26] nicolas
|
the control socket
|
|
[13:26] nicolas
|
is using rep
|
|
[13:30] nicolas
|
thanks I will update to latest stable
|
|
[17:55] cheng81
|
hello everyone, I have a question: is the java 0mq library an osgi bundle?
|
|
[17:56] ParadoxG
|
right now, to use zmq_msg_copy both zmq_msg_t's have to be initialized. Is this always going to be the case? or will it not be required in the future?
|
|
[17:59] pate
|
o/ all
|
|
[18:01] pate
|
have anyone of you tried to use 0mq while developing an eclipse plugin?
|
|
[18:04] pate
|
i am trying to do that but I'm really struggling in getting a 0mq version that is accepted by the rcp ... apparently I can only use 'plugins' and not jars to comply with the OSGi framework
|
|
[18:57] mickem
|
Is there any guide on how to best use zeromq in a multi threaded scenario? (ie. have multiple threads responding to messages)
|
|
[18:58] pieterh
|
mickem: you should read the Guide
|
|
[18:58] pieterh
|
it does explain the various effective ways to do this
|
|
[18:58] pate
|
in there you have in proc synching of threads
|
|
[19:00] mickem
|
humm... really... must have missed it then... sorry for bothering you...
|
|
[19:01] pieterh
|
mickem: the basic rules are: don't share sockets between threads, use inproc to connect threads, don't share state between threads
|
|
[19:01] pate
|
thus, use one single context
|
|
[19:04] mickem
|
ahh.. now I see it... sorry... I stopped reading after the big "diagram" thinking that was the end of the guide...
|
|
[19:04] pieterh
|
:-)
|
|
[19:19] pate
|
anyone has successfully bundled zmq jar into an eclipse plugin to be used in the eclipse rcp?
|
|
[19:19] pate
|
i am not able to find anything online and all my attempts till now failed
|
|
[19:27] pieterh
|
pate: never heard of anyone doing that
|
|
[19:45] replicator
|
hey Z Community, have a strange question to ask: "We need to consume market data (messages), but the publisher does not use ZeroMQ, is there a way for us to use ZeroMQ as a client ONLY?" Thank you!
|
|
[19:47] pieterh
|
replicator: sure, make a bridge that reads your publisher protocol and resends it as 0MQ messages
|
|
[19:47] xristos
|
you could have something in the middle that grabs publisher messages and publishes them over zmq
|
|
[19:47] pieterh
|
:)
|
|
[19:51] replicator
|
@pieterh_, @xristos thank you guys. when you say "a bridge", is that a ZeroMQ bridge or will I have to get into raw socket programming?
|
|
[19:52] grzesieq
|
zeromq can't magically learn to understand the other protocol :)
|
|
[19:52] xristos
|
replicator: that depends on the format that the publisher uses
|
|
[19:53] replicator
|
the protocol is proprietary ( a custom built that sending side requires us to use )
|
|
[19:54] replicator
|
I was thinking is there a way to templatize this protocol ( I have the spec ), so ZeroMQ can consume it and convert it to ZTM messages?
|
|
[19:55] replicator
|
or will I have to latch on to the raw socket, defragment all the packets until I make sense of the message ( according to this custom spec ), and only then resend it as ZMTP message
|
|
[20:02] grzesieq
|
you'll have to do it yourself
|
|
[20:03] replicator
|
:(
|
