| [Time] Name | Message |
|
[05:43] sustrik
|
ssi: !
|
|
[06:22] the_hulk
|
hi, can i build shared library for iphone
|
|
[06:26] the_hulk
|
hi
|
|
[06:26] the_hulk
|
can i build shared lib for ios?
|
|
[06:32] sustrik
|
i think so
|
|
[06:32] sustrik
|
check the mailing list archives
|
|
[06:32] sustrik
|
if you find no help there, ask on the mailing list
|
|
[06:47] the_hulk
|
not there in mailing list
|
|
[06:48] sustrik
|
ask then
|
|
[06:48] sustrik
|
i dimly recall there are people who've build it on ios sybscribed to the mailing list
|
|
[06:59] the_hulk
|
i got this list http://www.mail-archive.com/zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org/msg09332.html
|
|
[06:59] the_hulk
|
thread*
|
|
[07:00] the_hulk
|
which leads me here http://tinsuke.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/how-to-cross-compiling-libraries-for-ios-armv6armv7i386/
|
|
[09:21] the_hulk
|
sustrik, compliled successfully!! will test now
|
|
[09:21] sustrik
|
:)
|
|
[13:41] the_hulk
|
hi
|
|
[13:41] the_hulk
|
i have build an zmq for ios
|
|
[13:41] the_hulk
|
it gets built and i get .a file
|
|
[13:42] the_hulk
|
but when i include in xcode i get link error
|
|
[13:42] the_hulk
|
also while building zmq i get messages like
|
|
[13:43] the_hulk
|
'/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/usr/bin/ranlib: file: .libs/libzmq.a(libzmq_la-devpoll.o) has no symbols'
|
|
[13:43] the_hulk
|
any idea
|
|
[13:52] sustrik
|
no idea, try asking on the maling list
|
|
[14:38] ptrb
|
I'm using the C++ wrapper, and deleting the zmq::context_t as a method of signaling to threads waiting in blocked recv() calls to abort. However, deleting the context_t appears to be blocking in zmq_term (actually mailbox_t::recv). Should I be doing something else instead?
|
|
[14:39] dev_sa
|
exit
|
|
[14:46] ptrb
|
exit(3) is one option, yes...
|
|
[14:46] ptrb
|
a bit less elegant than I'd hoped.
|
|
[15:05] ptrb
|
oh, closing the sockets properly helps.
|
|
[15:20] the_hulk
|
tested on ios, at least unit test succeeds..
|
|
[15:39] ssi
|
sustrik: I hope your "!" was a "cool!" instead of a "you're a moron!" :D
|
|
[15:40] sustrik
|
cool
|
|
[15:40] sustrik
|
:)
|
|
[15:40] ssi
|
hehe good
|
|
[15:40] sustrik
|
that's something nobody has attempted so far
|
|
[15:41] ssi
|
it's going pretty well
|
|
[15:41] sustrik
|
do you have any idea how to accomplish that
|
|
[15:41] sustrik
|
?
|
|
[15:42] ssi
|
well, I have the framework for a provider library in place.
|
|
[15:42] sustrik
|
i mean, JMS assumes there's a central broker
|
|
[15:42] ssi
|
yeah, well here's my thought
|
|
[15:42] ssi
|
either a) you run a lightweight broker which is just a zmq device
|
|
[15:42] ssi
|
or b) you pass an embedded broker flag to one end
|
|
[15:42] ssi
|
and that provider lib runs a little embedded queueing system and binds to the url you provided as brokerurl
|
|
[15:43] ssi
|
then the consumers will connect to what they assume is a broker, but it's just the producer
|
|
[15:43] ssi
|
that gives me point to multipoint brokerless, or multipoint to multipoint with a dedicated broker
|
|
[15:43] ssi
|
it's going to do S&F only, because that's all we do here
|
|
[15:43] ssi
|
it'll be a very stripped down JMS implementation that just handles our needs
|
|
[15:44] ssi
|
we've had no end of problems with available JMS platforms
|
|
[15:44] ssi
|
which is how I stumbled across zeromq in the first place :)
|
|
[15:45] ssi
|
I'm slogging through all the boilerplate JMS stuff right now, factories to create all the different types of messages, but hopefully this afternoon I'll dig into the actual transport
|
|
[15:45] sustrik
|
is it going to be open source?
|
|
[15:46] ssi
|
I don't know if I'll be able to do that or not
|
|
[15:46] ssi
|
if I can, I would like to
|
|
[15:46] ssi
|
but my company doesn't make it easy
|
|
[15:46] sustrik
|
that would be nice
|
|
[15:46] sustrik
|
an gateway to enterprise :)
|
|
[15:46] ssi
|
also, I don't intend it to be a full-featured jms implementation, so I don't know how that'll go over in the wild
|
|
[15:46] ssi
|
jms in full is COMPLEX
|
|
[15:47] ssi
|
and that's what I'm trying to avoid!
|
|
[15:47] sustrik
|
the nice thing about open sourcing it would be that others can add features you don't care about
|
|
[15:47] ssi
|
sure
|
|
[15:47] ssi
|
we have a message pipelining platform here that's homegrown over the last 10 years
|
|
[15:47] ssi
|
and I wrote version 3 recently which is ground-up, using zmq as internal transport
|
|
[15:47] ssi
|
and it intrinsically supports zmq in place of jms for all its edge transport as well
|
|
[15:48] ssi
|
but it won't be ready for widespread deployment in the org for awhile
|
|
[15:48] ssi
|
meanwhile, we have a couple of properties who are mandating that we move off of activemq by september because it's been very unstable
|
|
[15:48] ssi
|
so as we're evaluating jms providers, I'm gonna write this one and throw it in the mix
|
|
[15:49] ssi
|
cross your fingers for me... in a year zeromq could be running cnn.com :)
|
|
[15:50] sustrik
|
wow!
|
|
[15:50] sustrik
|
fingers crossed :)
|
|
[15:50] ssi
|
anyway, lunch :D
|
|
[15:51] sustrik
|
cyl
|
|
[16:42] ssi
|
SO MUCH BOILERPLATE D:
|
|
[17:39] ssi
|
k I think I'm up against the point where I need to start writing transport :D
|
|
[21:34] pasz
|
can a spontaneous zmq_send to a reply be made following a zmq_poll?
|
|
[21:35] pasz
|
I have code that polls for new messages, however, sometimes the text reply doesnt get sent
|
|
[22:58] ssi
|
I'm not sure how to avoid using sockets in multiple threads with what I'm trying to do
|
|
[22:58] ssi
|
hrm maybe I am
|
