| [Time] Name | Message |
|
[00:26] prettyrobots
|
I just watched Zed's presentation. It would be fun to use this on the Internet.
|
|
[05:43] m2011
|
I have a quick question. I want to use 0mq to receive syslog messages from syslog servers running on router devices. What is the apporpriate socket type to use for this purpose? Should I use ZMQ_PULL? If yes, will it work without ZMQ_PUSH not done on the other end as it is the syslog server running on router device thats sending the syslog message.
|
|
[10:47] mikko
|
mato: here?
|
|
[16:05] sustrik
|
mikko: you there?
|
|
[16:13] mikko
|
sustrik: yes
|
|
[16:16] mikko
|
saw your email
|
|
[16:23] sustrik
|
there's som problem there
|
|
[16:23] sustrik
|
the space is interpreted as argument delimiter
|
|
[16:23] sustrik
|
and the whole thing fails
|
|
[16:23] sustrik
|
afaics
|
|
[17:30] john
|
is there a way for each subscriber to signal the publisher that it is connected without using a separate socket?
|
|
[17:35] cremes
|
john___: no
|
|
[17:45] john
|
thanks cremes I didn't think there was. I want to send one request to multiple nodes in sync and get a reponse from all of them. Is there a ideal way to do this without having to have each node use two sockets?
|
|
[17:47] cremes
|
john___: i can't think of a way using your constraints
|
|
[17:47] cremes
|
what's the problem with using 2 sockets?
|
|
[17:48] cremes
|
er, 2 *pairs* of sockets
|
|
[17:48] john
|
yeah I suppose 2 sockets for each node is acceptable.
|
|
[17:50] john
|
nodes with a subscribe and a push socket I think might do it.
|
|
[23:13] jbardin
|
heya guys
|
|
[23:14] jbardin
|
i am getting a wierd segfault in my ruby app (that uses ffi-rzmq gem) due to an assertion in epoll.cpp:69
|
|
[23:14] jbardin
|
Bad file descriptor
|
|
[23:14] jbardin
|
rc != -1 (epoll.cpp:69)
|
