| [Time] Name | Message |
|
[02:41] bitcycle
|
Hey all. I've got a coworker claiming that zeromq deployments have been experiencing several high availability failures... but I want to use it for our new message queuing system. How can I answer his objections to using zeromq?
|
|
[04:18] yukonbob
|
hello, #zeromq :)
|
|
[10:20] zjb
|
hi
|
|
[10:21] zjb
|
does anyone know if LINGER setting wokrs with forwarders?
|
|
[10:22] zjb
|
it seems that I still have to suspend a thread before calling zmq context to terminate
|
|
[10:22] mikko
|
zjb: what do you mean by forwarders?
|
|
[10:23] mikko
|
zmq_device forwarder?
|
|
[10:23] zjb
|
yes
|
|
[10:23] zjb
|
I'm using inproc forwarder
|
|
[11:45] zjb
|
Does zmq_device forwarder support LINGER setting?
|
|
[12:13] mikko
|
zjb: the forwarder device is independent from the sockets
|
|
[12:13] mikko
|
zjb: so if you've set it to both sockets then it should work
|
|
[12:14] zjb
|
mikko, yes, I have set it on both sockets
|
|
[12:15] zjb
|
and on the "feeding" sockets
|
|
[12:15] zjb
|
the ones that send data to the inproc forwarder
|
|
[12:16] zjb
|
I can't see any difference if its 0 or more than zero, -1 blocks
|
|
[12:17] zjb
|
if main thread is suspended for 1s before context terminates, then all messages are sent
|
|
[16:07] ianbarber
|
anyone got pgm working in erlzmq2 at all? getting a Assertion failed: rc == 0 (connect_session.cpp:84), not a lot of output from pgm on log level trace either.
|
|
[17:03] yukonbob
|
seems there's no name resolution when declaring addresses (ie: zmq_bind(sock, "tcp://localhost:9999");, plans for this, or should be addressed separately in language bindings?
|
|
[17:05] yukonbob
|
(or, am I mistaken? Am using 2.1.7)
|
|
[21:56] CIA-31
|
pyzmq: 03MinRK 07master * rfa3e061 10/ zmq/eventloop/ioloop.py : Don't exit loop on EINTR ...
|
|
[22:14] yukonbob
|
question re: zmq_setsockopt(); I'm getting "Invalid argument" errors. if the option value is a string, I'm just placing pointer to string in a void *ptr; if optval is an int, am placing &int in void* ptr. Am I doing this correctly?
|
|
[22:30] yukonbob
|
ah -- partial success... int vs. int64_t
|
|
[22:40] blk
|
any reason why sending DEALER -> ROUTER would drop a message ?
|
|
[22:41] blk
|
(tcp)
|
|
[22:43] michelp
|
blk, did you see the missing message flowchart in the guide?
|
|
[22:44] michelp
|
good place to start when messaged dont' arrive when you think they should
|
|
[22:47] blk
|
thanks michelp
|
|
[22:50] yukonbob
|
are my dev questions better asked in a diff't forum?
|
|
[23:36] yukonbob
|
...and, for anybody else following: make sure the options your using as test cases are applicable to socket type ;)
|
