Monday April 11, 2011
[Time] Name | Message |
---|---|
[11:54] NikolaVeber | yrashk, |
[12:06] valmac | hi everybody! |
[14:09] NikolaVeber | yrashk, I've just made some simple test using erlang binding and c++ over gigabit network |
[14:10] NikolaVeber | I was able to saturate the network easily with strings ca 200-300 characters long |
[14:11] NikolaVeber | and for short messages I got about 0,5 / 0,6 million msg/sec |
[14:12] NikolaVeber | pub-sub pattern |
[14:16] evax | NikolaVeber: hi, were you using active or passive mode ? |
[14:16] NikolaVeber | hm... |
[14:16] NikolaVeber | no idea :) |
[14:16] evax | active mode delivers messages to your process directly |
[14:17] evax | passive mode requires you to recv |
[14:17] NikolaVeber | passive |
[14:17] NikolaVeber | subscriber.recv(&msg); |
[14:17] NikolaVeber | thats in my subscriber loop |
[14:17] evax | I meant from Erlang |
[14:18] NikolaVeber | I was sending from erlang |
[14:18] NikolaVeber | just got it one way so far |
[14:19] NikolaVeber | active should be faster? |
[14:19] evax | no |
[14:19] evax | and active is for receiving from erlang |
[14:20] evax | could you paste your code to some place ? |
[14:20] NikolaVeber | priv? |
[14:20] NikolaVeber | or let me open pastebin |
[14:22] seangrove | Hmm, looks like I've painte myself into a corner with zeromq causing segfaults now |
[14:22] seangrove | What should I make of "Assertion failed: unnamed_sessions.empty () (socket_base.cpp:507) |
[14:22] seangrove | ? |
[15:04] mikko | seangrove: how does that happen? |