[Time] Name | Message |
[01:17] rbraley
|
is there a good way to write to a file asynchronously in zeromq?
|
[08:57] mikko
|
rbraley: can you elaborate a bit?
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * rbd0ba6e 10/ (6 files in 2 dirs):
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: Size of inproc hwm and swap is sum of peers' hwms and swaps
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: The meat of the patch was contributed by Douglas Creager.
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: Martin Sustrik implemented storing peer options in inproc
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: endpoint repository.
|
[12:54] CIA-21
|
zeromq2: Signed-off-by: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com> - http://bit.ly/fE9QLj
|
[14:34] zchrish
|
Is there a way to control which IP addresses subscribe to a publisher?
|
[14:50] sustrik
|
firewall?
|
[15:11] zchrish
|
OK; I assumed that was the design of the package. Thank you.
|
[17:25] zchrish
|
Is there a way to determine which IP addresses are subscribed to a publisher?
|
[17:28] cremes
|
zchrish: not from within the framework
|
[17:29] zchrish
|
ok; thank you.
|
[17:48] s0undt3ch
|
hello ppl
|
[17:48] s0undt3ch
|
using pyzmq
|
[17:48] s0undt3ch
|
if we want to filter PUB/SUB messages, we need to send them multipart?
|
[17:50] Vince
|
hey
|
[17:53] Vince
|
I've making a wrapper and zmq_bind crashes. I am certain I am sending the right information at the API zmq_bind%(pSoc%,psAddr$):"zmq_bind" and RetVal = zmq_bind(pSoc, "tcp://*:5555")
|
[17:53] sustrik
|
s0undt3ch: no
|
[17:53] s0undt3ch
|
sustrik: plain send right?
|
[17:53] sustrik
|
yes
|
[17:54] sustrik
|
Vince__: what's the crash?
|
[17:54] s0undt3ch
|
send_pyobj won't allow this :\
|
[17:54] sustrik
|
how come?
|
[17:55] Vince
|
Unfortunately I don't know because this is a user library for Blitz Basic and the debugger crashes with no output.
|
[17:55] sustrik
|
hard to help then
|
[17:56] sustrik
|
but i haven't seen any reports about zmq_bind crashing yet
|
[17:56] sustrik
|
so maybe you should look at the layers above first
|
[17:56] s0undt3ch
|
sustrik: send_pyobj pickles and unpicles the object we pass, filtering is done similar to msg.startswith() which won't work on a pickled string
|
[17:57] sustrik
|
i see
|
[17:57] sustrik
|
then maybe make a pyzmq patch
|
[17:57] sustrik
|
to allow simple pub/sub messages
|
[17:57] Vince
|
Is it possible to make zeromq to a debug dump as API access occurs? Maybe to a text file or something?
|
[17:58] s0undt3ch
|
sustrik: simple pub/sub messages, text messages, it supports them, I just wanted the pickling/unpickling to be automated ;)
|
[17:58] sustrik
|
Vince__: you can create a core dump and inspect it in debugger afterwards
|
[17:58] s0undt3ch
|
If I pickle/unpickle myself, I can do, 'filter <pickled_string>'
|
[17:58] s0undt3ch
|
but then I have to be the one pickling and unpickling
|
[18:00] sustrik
|
i see
|
[18:04] s0undt3ch
|
anyway, since the filtering is done on the client side, I might skip it or work arround that issue
|
[18:22] guido_g
|
why not put the topic (plus '\0') before the pickled data and on receive split on the first '\0'?
|
[18:37] s0undt3ch
|
guido_g: that's an idea, but it needs to be done on the python bindings
|
[18:37] guido_g
|
why?
|
[18:38] s0undt3ch
|
guido_g: because using recv_pyobjc does the unplickling for us, so, \0 spliting should be done before unpickling
|
[18:38] s0undt3ch
|
ecv_pyobj
|
[18:38] s0undt3ch
|
errrr
|
[18:38] s0undt3ch
|
*recv_pyobj
|
[18:39] guido_g
|
recv_pyobj is a general method, not only for sub sockets
|
[18:40] guido_g
|
just derive a class and implement your desired behaviour
|
[18:40] guido_g
|
much much easier, for you and the pyzmq devs
|
[18:41] s0undt3ch
|
that can be done to, sure, but then I'd have to also subclass Context in order for it to return my socket implementation
|
[18:41] guido_g
|
just start to use a factory
|
[18:41] s0undt3ch
|
guido_g: so right now, I might just use another socket for the filtering :)
|
[19:08] s0undt3ch
|
guido_g: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/318466/
|
[19:09] guido_g
|
this is for sub sockets only?
|
[19:10] s0undt3ch
|
guido_g: when you mean sub, you mean those we get from context.socket?
|
[19:10] s0undt3ch
|
well, anyway dunno, all of those that make use of socket.pyx
|
[19:10] guido_g
|
no
|
[19:10] guido_g
|
i mean sockets of type zmq.SUB
|
[19:11] s0undt3ch
|
ah
|
[19:11] s0undt3ch
|
didn't though of that
|
[19:11] s0undt3ch
|
:)
|
[19:11] guido_g
|
or zmq.PUB
|
[19:11] guido_g
|
so you allow a topic for all sockets
|
[19:11] guido_g
|
which is silly
|
[19:11] s0undt3ch
|
yes
|
[19:13] guido_g
|
as I said, implement a socket factory where you register your _special_ sockets
|
[19:14] guido_g
|
so you don't need to patch a perfectly nice working module and would gain a higher degree of freedom
|
[19:17] s0undt3ch
|
yeah
|
[22:16] vince
|
Finally managed to get an error out of Bind failing on my wrapper. First-chance exception at 0x762cb727 in test.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: zmq::error_t at memory location 0x0019f8f0..
|
[22:30] mikko
|
vince____: is that an unhandled exception?
|