ZeroMq IRC Log

Monday July 19, 2010

[Time] Name	Message
[02:33] jugg	sustrik: http://paste2.org/p/919678
[06:21] sustrik	sbeaulois_: it's what it says, too many open file descriptors
[06:21] sustrik	increase limit for file descriptors on your system
[06:21] sustrik	jugg: oops
[06:23] sustrik	jugg: fixed
[06:37] CIA-17	zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * raedf3f8 10/ src/tcp_socket.cpp : EHOSTUNREACH is a valid return value from recv() - http://bit.ly/91cQRJ
[09:14] travlr	sustrik: do you want to see zmq irc log files publicly hosted and search-able
[09:25] sustrik	travlr: that would be great
[09:25] sustrik	do you need any extra privileges for that?
[09:28] mato	sustrik: are you there?
[09:36] travlr	sustrik: sorry. i got distracted :)
[09:37] travlr	privledges are a different story.. yes
[09:38] travlr	what i need to ask for is if you have the history of log files, because i just realized what i have has a huge hole in them
[09:39] sustrik	travlr: no, i haven't logged the discussion :(
[09:39] travlr	i'll ask on the mail list
[09:40] sustrik	ok
[09:40] travlr	the doxygen docs will now be automatically updated with each commit to master. i'll host that here for now
[09:41] sustrik	should we link them from zeromq.org?
[09:42] travlr	yes. which page.. source or contribute?
[09:42] sustrik	source IMO
[09:43] travlr	k. if you want to give me more privleges i can do some work on the site from time to time. the articles need to be sorted out for zmq1
[09:44] sustrik	lemme see
[09:46] sustrik	whipapers:* you mean, right?
[09:46] sustrik	whitepapers.*
[09:47] travlr	yeah. but its labled as articles atm
[09:50] sustrik	travlr: i've allowed editing of articles
[09:51] sustrik	try now
[09:51] travlr	btw, i also want to link to gentoo ebuilds for zmq and a bunch of bindings
[09:51] sustrik	bindings are editable
[09:51] travlr	how about the download page too, or you can do it for me
[09:52] travlr	i'll give you the link
[09:52] travlr	they are temporarily hosted at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320657
[09:53] travlr	i'm working on getting them in the package tree
[09:53] sustrik	i would say there should be a 'distros' section or something
[09:53] travlr	true
[09:55] sustrik	try editing distro:gentoo page
[09:55] travlr	nope
[09:56] travlr	i see the page
[09:56] travlr	but no edit
[09:57] travlr	hey. btw... my wikidot name is travlr now
[09:57] travlr	i can't edit articles either
[09:57] travlr	i'm logged in atm
[09:59] travlr	i'll be back in a couple minutes
[10:02] sustrik	are you member of the wiki
[10:02] sustrik	?
[10:04] travlr	yeah i currently have access to the bindings, etc
[10:04] travlr	'travlr'
[10:07] sustrik	yep, you are a member
[10:07] sustrik	distro:* pages are set to be editable by members
[10:07] sustrik	hm
[10:07] sustrik	maybe it takes a while till the permissions take effect?
[10:08] travlr	yeah maybe. no hurry.
[10:09] travlr	if you like having the doxygen docs, maybe we ought to talk in the near future of changing the way comments are written
[10:12] sustrik	travlr: definitely
[10:12] sustrik	even the first patch isn't applied yet
[10:12] travlr	no i just run a parser for now.
[10:12] sustrik	a-ha
[10:13] sustrik	so that would be the first step imo:
[10:13] sustrik	modify the comments to doxygen friendly format
[10:13] sustrik	then start improving them
[10:14] travlr	yes, there is a lot that can be done... or they can be kept minimal
[10:14] sustrik	i would rather have it well documented
[10:14] travlr	it depends on what you want and not to mention avoiding clutter
[10:17] sustrik	well, i would like a random developer to have a look at the source
[10:17] sustrik	and get at least some idea about what it does
[10:18] travlr	btw, the current version i have hosted is configured with nearly every doxygen feature. including inline function sources
[10:18] travlr	i like it but we can trim some features down if you like
[10:19] sustrik	is there any point of having the source in the docs?
[10:19] travlr	cross-linking references..
[10:21] travlr	you'll see links to and from the sources... the inline sources are something i just decided to throw in and see how they look... could be a bit much..
[10:23] travlr	i dunno, i kind of like them inline too.
[10:26] travlr	notice the class diagrams are folded (hidden) at the top of the page. that help lose the clutter a bit but if you don't know they're there they can be missed
[10:26] travlr	s/help/helps
[10:30] sustrik	what's the link?
[10:30] travlr	http://travlr.github.com/zeromq2/index.html
[10:30] travlr	need some text on the front page still too
[10:31] sustrik	the inline code is a bit superfluous imo
[10:31] sustrik	otherwise it's good
[10:32] sustrik	as for the first page, a single sentence would be enough
[10:32] sustrik	just saying what it is and linking back to zeromq.org for more info
[10:33] travlr	what ever you think is best. i threw in all the features to see how it looked with doxygen's new version's layout
[10:33] travlr	usefullness is good... clutter is bad ;)
[10:34] sustrik	:)
[10:34] sustrik	just remove the inline code and link it from "source"
[10:34] sustrik	thanks
[10:34] sustrik	cyl
[10:34] travlr	sure.. gotta go now too.
[10:34] travlr	later
[10:44] mikko	peter
[10:46] mikko	nm
[12:17] Lazesharp	interesting
[12:17] Lazesharp	just had a problem gettting 2.0.7 to compile with pgm:
[12:17] Lazesharp	/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libzmq_la-txwi.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `pgm_rs_create' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
[12:17] Lazesharp	/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
[12:17] Lazesharp	collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
[12:17] Lazesharp	make[2]: *** [libzmq.la] Error 1
[12:17] Lazesharp	not the end of the world, because it compiles just fine without pgm, but if anyone knows what the problem is, I'd appreciate the answer :0
[12:17] Lazesharp	*:)
[14:12] sustrik	Lazesharp: I recall this problem was already discussed on the mailing list
[14:12] sustrik	you may want to do some search
[14:12] Lazesharp	ok, cheers
[15:45] Lazesharp	besides libuuid and openpgm, does 0mq have any other deps or dependant versions?
[15:45] Lazesharp	I saw a blog somewhere mention automake2.6 was necessary
[17:32] sustrik	Lazesharp; autotools are build-time dependency, not runtime dependency
[22:35] perplexes	can anyone point me to some good intro docs for zmq?