| [Time] Name | Message |
|
[06:21] CIA-5
|
zeromq2: 03Jon Dyte 07master * redfd05d 10/ (13 files in 5 dirs): devices can be created via API - http://bit.ly/dhJb8o
|
|
[06:21] CIA-5
|
zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * r065e4d0 10/ (doc/zmq_bind.txt doc/zmq_setsockopt.txt): Merge branch 'master' of git@github.com:sustrik/zeromq2 - http://bit.ly/brkzAh
|
|
[08:41] CIA-5
|
zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * rb0250cc 10/ builds/msvc/libzmq/libzmq.vcproj : Win32 build fixed - http://bit.ly/9F6ImT
|
|
[09:02] mikko
|
good morning
|
|
[09:11] sustrik
|
mikko: morning
|
|
[09:12] mikko
|
sunny berlin
|
|
[09:13] mikko
|
drinking double espresso in a cafe and waiting for my flight back
|
|
[09:14] sustrik
|
lucky you :)
|
|
[09:15] mikko
|
gdb is acting weird
|
|
[09:15] mikko
|
(gdb) thread apply all bt
|
|
[09:15] mikko
|
Cannot find new threads: generic error
|
|
[09:15] mikko
|
do you ever get this?
|
|
[09:15] sustrik
|
no
|
|
[09:15] sustrik
|
but gdb sometimes acks in strange ways
|
|
[09:16] sustrik
|
memory overwrites (?)
|
|
[09:17] mikko
|
i get this whenever i run anything using libzmq
|
|
[09:17] mikko
|
might be a kernel issue as well
|
|
[09:17] sustrik
|
linux?
|
|
[09:17] mikko
|
yep
|
|
[09:17] mikko
|
Linux newdev 2.6.32-3-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 24 18:07:42 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
|
|
[09:18] sustrik
|
it behaves normally here:
|
|
[09:18] sustrik
|
Linux istvan 2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:38:19 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
|
|
[09:18] mikko
|
#58-ubuntu
|
|
[09:18] mikko
|
thats a lot of compiles :)
|
|
[09:18] mikko
|
ermm builds
|
|
[09:19] sustrik
|
:)
|
|
[09:19] sustrik
|
gcc 4.4.1
|
|
[09:20] mikko
|
gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9)
|
|
[09:20] mikko
|
i'll try compiling with -ggdb3
|
|
[09:20] mikko
|
shouldnt make difference though
|
|
[09:21] mikko
|
or my env is just a bit too bleeding edge
|
|
[09:22] mikko
|
i added polling support last night to php-zeromq
|
|
[09:22] mikko
|
i think it starts to be feature complete soon
|
|
[09:22] sustrik
|
great
|
|
[09:23] sustrik
|
we've started a 0MQ blog, so when you have it ready it can be announced via blog (if you are willing to write few paragraphs about the binding)
|
|
[09:25] mikko
|
sure
|
|
[09:46] mikko
|
sustrik: http://pastie.org/907178
|
|
[09:46] mikko
|
is that me or libzmq?
|
|
[09:48] sustrik
|
mikko: it's trunk or 2.0.6?
|
|
[09:50] sustrik
|
looks like trunk...
|
|
[09:51] sustrik
|
there's
|
|
[09:51] sustrik
|
a bug there
|
|
[09:51] sustrik
|
let me fix it
|
|
[09:52] mikko
|
trunk
|
|
[09:52] mikko
|
thanks
|
|
[09:54] CIA-5
|
zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * r745db9c 10/ src/session.cpp : unitialised member in seesion_t class - fixed - http://bit.ly/dfTd1L
|
|
[09:54] CIA-5
|
zeromq2: 03Martin Sustrik 07master * r0f7aab5 10/ builds/msvc/libzmq/libzmq.vcproj : Merge branch 'master' of git@github.com:sustrik/zeromq2 - http://bit.ly/aQv9SX
|
|
[09:55] sustrik
|
mikko: try now
|
|
[10:01] mikko
|
sustrik: ok, sec
|
|
[10:02] mikko
|
off to the airport
|
|
[10:02] mikko
|
i'll be back later ->
|
|
[10:04] sustrik
|
cya
|
|
[19:32] mikko
|
back!
|
|
[19:36] mikko
|
sustrik: are you still here?
|
|
[19:43] sustrik
|
mikko: yes
|
|
[19:44] mikko
|
i found something new
|
|
[19:44] mikko
|
http://pastie.org/908107
|
|
[19:45] mikko
|
haven't got down to it yet
|
|
[19:45] mikko
|
but seems to happen when i create pollitem but don't execute poll
|
|
[19:46] sustrik
|
hm, pollitem is a dumb structure
|
|
[19:46] sustrik
|
it should have no effect
|
|
[19:47] mikko
|
yep, i noticed
|
|
[19:47] mikko
|
it might be something in my code as well
|
|
[19:48] mikko
|
# ./test
|
|
[19:48] mikko
|
Assertion failed: load.get () == 0 (epoll.cpp:49)
|
|
[19:48] mikko
|
Aborted
|
|
[19:48] mikko
|
here we go
|
|
[19:48] mikko
|
that's not the one i get though
|
|
[19:49] sustrik
|
ok, there's definitely a race condition in socket shutdown mechanism
|
|
[19:49] sustrik
|
it've been reported serveral times
|
|
[19:49] sustrik
|
what i need is to reproduce it here
|
|
[19:49] sustrik
|
do you have a test program?
|
|
[19:49] mikko
|
ok, let me pastebin it
|
|
[19:49] mikko
|
yes i do
|
|
[19:50] sustrik
|
great, can you send it to me?
|
|
[19:50] mikko
|
http://pastie.org/908126
|
|
[19:50] mikko
|
there
|
|
[19:50] sustrik
|
thx
|
|
[19:50] mikko
|
testing with github master
|
|
[19:50] mikko
|
(i think)
|
|
[19:50] sustrik
|
ok
|
|
[19:51] mikko
|
yes, interesting enough similar code generates: Invalid argument (mutex.hpp:97) under valgrind
|
|
[19:52] mikko
|
so might be a race condition indeed
|
|
[19:53] mikko
|
i'm probably stumbling into all possible edge cases here :)
|
|
[19:54] sustrik
|
looks like it has to do with closing an unconnected socket...
|
|
[19:54] sustrik
|
i'll give it a closer look tomorrow
|
|
[19:54] mikko
|
you are right
|
|
[20:03] mikko
|
Assertion failed: !sending_reply || !more || reply_pipe != pipe_ (rep.cpp:96)
|
|
[20:03] mikko
|
Aborted
|
|
[20:03] mikko
|
this is interesting as well
|
|
[21:38] lvh
|
Hello.
|
|
[21:39] lvh
|
I've got a use case and I'm wondering how it translates into 0MQ.
|
|
[21:39] lvh
|
Stuff comes in, all of it gets persisted. Some of it gets pushed to a COMET server and eventually to someone's browser.
|
|
[21:40] lvh
|
For persistence, I'd like something with load balancing and possibly failover (if possible), but the COMET part is special: out of all the persisters, only one of them needs to be pushed to, but all of the COMET listeners need to be pushed to.
|
|
[21:41] lvh
|
Can I do that without sending a message twice?
|
|
[21:41] lvh
|
Can I send a message twice into two exchanges?
|
